Lessons in the Art of War: Martial Strategies for the Successful Fighter
The martial arts have a long tradition emphasizing the wisdom of Asian philosophers such as Sun Tzu and Miyamoto Musashi. These philosophers owe much of their longevity to their use of universal principles for fighting. Sun Tzu, for example, in his Art of War which might be the most widely studied of the Asian military treatises, did not speak of a mutually agreed upon code of conduct in battle. Rather, he assessed the terrain, weather, and leadership for the purpose of determining if the conditions favored victory. Although his battle philosophy emphasized quick victory, tactics of trickery and deception were elevated and described as virtues of great generals. The Japanese swordsman Miyamoto Musashi, in A Book of Five Rings, likewise viewed warfare as a pragmatic undertaking which purpose it was to defeat the enemy by killing him. He followed a set of “natural” (scientific) principles, and attributed his victories to his understanding of these principles; one of which was the importance of mental balance and the ability to stop an attack at the outset in order to stifle an opponent’s speed and power.

Aikido is a strictly defensive martial art that relies on controlling the center of the action, using the opponent’s energy against him often through a weakness in his anatomy such as the wrist. Once the attack has been neutralized, the aikido practitioner can force the adversary to submit through pain compliance without actually damaging the joint. (Image source: Magyar Balazs, Wikimedia Commons)
The most prominent military thinker in the West was likely Carl von Clausewitz, an early nineteenth century Prussian soldier and military strategist. Clausewitz presented his ideas as timeless and consistent theory of conflict. Like the Asian philosophers, he sought to discover a universal nature of combat while illustrating his principles through the use of specific examples. At the heart of his theory might be the theme that combat is talked about in one way and exercised in another.
.jpg)
Statue of ancient Greek boxer resting on a boulder after a match, from the Thermae of Constantine, third to second century BCE. Note the leather straps used by the boxer to protect the knuckles and increase the damaging power of the strike. (Image source: Marie-Lan Nguyen, Wikimedia Commons)
The main difference between the writings of these military strategists may be that Sun Tzu provided specific steps for every conceivable battlefield situation (for example: “On encircled terrain, I obstruct any openings”), while Clausewitz emphasized that various “frictions” such as uncertainty, ignorance, confusion, and fatigue often interfere with one’s combat plan and prevents one from exercising full power and control over the enemy. On a conceptual level, however, their discourse displays far more similarities than differences which further demonstrates that factors such as time period (Sun Tzu and Clausewitz were separated in time by more than two millennia), geographical location (Asia versus Europe), and cultural issues (debated by military historian Victor Davis Hanson in his book, Carnage and Culture) are less significant in combat than are the understanding and embrace of a universal human nature. In order to determine how their respective theories have affected the modern martial arts practitioner, one must also consider them within the political framework of the times.
.jpg)
.jpg)